
Jeremy Simmons, MFA
I teach painting and drawing the way I make paintings and drawings — as a practice of close observation, disciplined revision, and honest critique.
Some of my most durable lessons as an artist came from failure in the studio: a painting scraped down and started over, a plate over-etched, a drawing pushed past the point where it worked and then rebuilt. My goal is for students to leave my courses not only with stronger technical and visual skills, but with the confidence to make decisions, respond to feedback, and keep working when the first attempt fails.
At left — I am with a full kiln load of my personal ceramic artwork that is ready to be bisque fired.
TEACHING PHILOSOPHY
Studio Teaching: Demonstration, Critique, Revision
In studio courses, I combine focused demonstrations, clear assignments, individual coaching, and structured group critique. I set transparent expectations through rubrics and examples, while recognizing that students reach strong outcomes by different paths — a beginning drawing student and an advanced painting major are not solving the same problem, even in the same room.
Critique is central to how I teach. Students describe what they observe, name their own goals for the piece, consider how a viewer might read it, and decide what to push further. This builds technical proficiency alongside visual literacy and self-assessment — the ability to talk about one's own work with clarity, a skill many students, including first-generation and returning students, have never been asked to practice before arriving in my classroom.
Art History as Transferable Inquiry
I also teach art history, art appreciation, and interdisciplinary arts, where I treat visual analysis as a transferable form of inquiry: observation, evidence versus assumption, an interpretive claim, comparison across contexts, and a well-supported conclusion. These are not only studio-adjacent skills — they carry into research, writing, and professional communication regardless of a student's major. I use concise lectures, close looking at images, guided analysis, and discussion to keep this rigorous without making it inaccessible to students encountering formal art history for the first time.
Student-Centered, Inclusive by Design
Regional, comprehensive institutions serve students who bring a wide range of life experience into the classroom — first-generation and returning students, working students and parents, student-athletes, and students whose prior access to arts education has varied widely. I view that range as a source of perspective, not a deficit.
I work with Disability Services to implement approved accommodations, and across face-to-face, hybrid, and online sections I rely on clear organization, detailed instructions, visual examples, transparent rubrics, and frequent low-stakes opportunities for feedback — practices that support students with accommodations while improving the course for everyone. My role is to hold a high standard while making the path toward it visible.
Learning Beyond the Classroom
I treat community arts institutions as an extension of the studio rather than a field trip from it. I coordinate students' direct contact with exhibition practice — juried competitions, gallery talks, and visiting-artist critique — through partnerships with a regional art museum and community arts centers, so that presenting work publicly becomes a normal, recurring part of their education. I've brought that same public-facing approach to K–12 audiences as well, co-leading an elementary-school art and art-history workshop.
I developed and taught Southern Pottery Throw Down, a high-impact experiential-learning course that took students into the field in Louisiana and Mississippi to experience Newcomb Pottery, Shearwater Pottery, George Ohr, and Southern face-jug traditions firsthand — because some of the most important learning happens when students connect their region's material culture to their own hands-on practice.
I've mentored students into fully funded MFA programs and helped several present their work at regional and juried exhibitions before they graduated. As a longtime faculty advisor to a student art organization, I've also seen how much of a student's growth as an artist happens outside of graded coursework, in the community they build with other makers.
I scaffold that growth deliberately: lower-level courses open with self-inventories and foundational-skill exercises that build curiosity and self-awareness, while upper-level courses ask students to apply those skills in authentic scenarios — mock client briefs, collaborative problem-solving, research projects, and capstones — that build the professional communication and durable, career-ready competencies (critical thinking, written and oral communication, teamwork, technology) they'll carry past graduation.